Charles Edwards and Melanie Mallebranche v. Alisa Edwards
Opinion
Opinion issued April 22, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00220-CV ——————————— CHARLES EDWARDS AND MELANIE MALLEBRANCH, Appellants V. ALISA EDWARDS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 295th District Court of Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-16062
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Automation Wash, Ltd., has filed an appeal from the Order and
Final Summary Judgment signed by the trial court on March 10, 2014. Although
no motion to dismiss has been properly filed, appellants Charles Edwards and
Melanie Mallebranche informed the Court by telephone they no longer wish to
pursue the appeal. Further, the required fees have not been paid and appellants are not appealing as indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged
in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug.
28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). After being notified on
March 31, 2014 that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot and for want of prosecution for
failure to pay fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles Edwards and Melanie Mallebranche v. Alisa Edwards (Charles Edwards and Melanie Mallebranche v. Alisa Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.