Charles Edward Turner, A/K/A Paul William Scott v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Charles Edward Turner, A/K/A Paul William Scott v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

56 F.3d 62, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19138, 1995 WL 318482

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket94-7029

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 62 (Charles Edward Turner, A/K/A Paul William Scott v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Edward Turner, A/K/A Paul William Scott v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 56 F.3d 62, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19138, 1995 WL 318482 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Edward TURNER, a/k/a Paul William Scott, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7029.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 1994.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Charles Edward Turner, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Turner v. Murray, No. CA-94-55 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Edward TURNER, a/k/a Paul William Scott, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7029.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 1994.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Charles Edward Turner, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Turner v. Murray, No. CA-94-55 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) (1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 62, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19138, 1995 WL 318482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-edward-turner-aka-paul-william-scott-v-edw-ca4-1995.