Charles Edward Bell v. State

Opinion

'IN 14th COlWOKAPPEALS HOUSlONi/EXAS

JUN 17 2035 4H * H-li'@P>$®& ~ceA rt~N-\mmkmiEeuumm- CLERK '. In \hc (Wff o& ifyapeds oJr ?&l fajfmm .Uu& W; 1?x^ 77QQ2.

Chtulet Bfil f/V,DOeSlgqi4.

"The S-hs4e c>£- *TfxCvS (Appe^)

Apftf^i ftf £W- ^liar I4l2fr4j J t4l3rjn lm«a 4*Vy ^H jjfJ^f E>is4ir»>- Pra 5>£ -fl-fop Is: :

^_

'

n,

44**-i Arxap fil^j^ UaJ ik. n«M~ ihss Q file a Pn) £e fen 4i£> ftr r?s,

As^A\ At Ox ^ ld>-nte>'.f*&. yTM^in ! •) a? - (?'A &f?cs^ 4^ V-v,J '•>,-\p&?u 4'^ &-j£r &•-> mantes, ^ " $ v "' $ ^J~^ I ' Cf C $ -

5f.

',"; ,." .9 ~ u ' " t \

•By gfrpPAik .SotT. :

Sg.Spgg.4^fti)llm St...hto 4f f J.

: ^ptae^aM ?m &e

iar© Ahs.fege,g pig. Bwi. l-W,;?"-e rfc TES^ LXH>&if&i'g„r£ ?&$>$. £f- *sotUK So^W'fQ,

i hgrcka' £3UrK£-\x tyrJr on 44tt. &**> al AurtL. :2CHT,A. ir^e. A* I /.wr4 eon*.

-t-

Ch&rks Rfefl "OoeAlafld^. Pfz3 && U 0

^j) • " " ~ :' "" \t\ ^W^-i-aift/sJ Dufi^CQ H ii^ -rkft-tm Aw/l^U ."T^X/aA yVroJa A'^gsil ol&efgire- O ^ r