Charles E. Smith v. Long Island Village Owners Association, Inc. F/K/A Outdoor resorts/south Padre Owner's Association, Inc.
This text of Charles E. Smith v. Long Island Village Owners Association, Inc. F/K/A Outdoor resorts/south Padre Owner's Association, Inc. (Charles E. Smith v. Long Island Village Owners Association, Inc. F/K/A Outdoor resorts/south Padre Owner's Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00610-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
CHARLES E. SMITH, ET AL., Appellants,
v.
LONG ISLAND VILLAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. F/K/A OUTDOOR RESORTS/SOUTH PADRE OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, Charles E. Smith, et al., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order
signed on October 9, 2012, in cause no. 2011-DCL-7171-I. Upon review of the
documents before the Court, it appeared that there was no final, appealable judgment dated October 9, 2012. On October 15, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant of
this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within
ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to
correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for
want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF
JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 7th day of February, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles E. Smith v. Long Island Village Owners Association, Inc. F/K/A Outdoor resorts/south Padre Owner's Association, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-e-smith-v-long-island-village-owners-assoc-texapp-2013.