Charles E. Schroeder and Erin K. Schroeder v. Brad Taylor D/B/A Taylor Landscape

Court of Appeals of Texas

Charles E. Schroeder and Erin K. Schroeder v. Brad Taylor D/B/A Taylor Landscape

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 2016·No. 11-15-00230-CV·Published

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Charles E. Schroeder and * From the 104th District Court Erin K. Schroeder, of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 24,167-B.

Vs. No. 11-15-00230-CV * May 27, 2016

Brad Taylor d/b/a Taylor Landscape, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss this appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Charles E. Schroeder and * From the 104th District Court Erin K. Schroeder, of Taylor County, Trial Court No. 24,167-B.

Vs. No. 11-15-00230-CV * May 27, 2016

Brad Taylor d/b/a Taylor Landscape, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss this appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.

Charles E. Schroeder and Erin K. Schroeder v. Brad Taylor D/B/A Taylor Landscape, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Charles E. Schroeder and Erin K. Schroeder v. Brad Taylor D/B/A Taylor Landscape (Charles E. Schroeder and Erin K. Schroeder v. Brad Taylor D/B/A Taylor Landscape) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.