Charles E. O'COnnOr v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General
239 F.2d 69, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 249
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 15, 1956·No. 13011_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The plaintiff contends he was unlawfully dismissed from his position as a post office clerk. The Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission affirmed his dismissal late in 1952. From April 1952 to May 1954 his counsel was seriously ill. His present complaint was filed August 16, 1954. We see no reason to disturb the District Court’s conclusion that any relief to which he might otherwise be entitled was barred by laches.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles E. O'COnnOr v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, 239 F.2d 69, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 249 (D.C. Cir. 1956).
239 F.2d 69 (Charles E. O'COnnOr v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pearle Henrietta Gersten, of the Estate of William F. Oberkoetter v. The United States
364 F.2d 850 (Court of Claims, 1966)
Gersten v. United States
364 F.2d 850 (Court of Claims, 1966)
Leland A. Chappelle v. Dudley C. Sharp, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force
301 F.2d 506 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)