Charles E. O'COnnOr v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General
This text of 239 F.2d 69 (Charles E. O'COnnOr v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff contends he was unlawfully dismissed from his position as a post office clerk. The Board of Appeals and Review of the Civil Service Commission affirmed his dismissal late in 1952. From April 1952 to May 1954 his counsel was seriously ill. His present complaint was filed August 16, 1954. We see no reason to disturb the District Court’s conclusion that any relief to which he might otherwise be entitled was barred by laches.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 F.2d 69, 99 U.S. App. D.C. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-e-oconnor-v-arthur-e-summerfield-postmaster-general-cadc-1956.