Charles E. Merzbach Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 174, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1201
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 10, 1962
DocketNo. 66894; protests 329035-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 174 (Charles E. Merzbach Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles E. Merzbach Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 174, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1201 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature railroad equipment, wbicb includes locomotives and other railroad cars, tracks, and accessories, similar in all material respects to that tbe subject of United States v. Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. (47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), tbe merchandise was held dutiable as follows : Tbe items marked “A” on tbe basis of their individual components, the locomotives at 13% percent under tbe provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device and tbe cars and tracks at tbe appropriate rate of duty, depending upon tbe date of entry, under tbe provision in paragraph 397, as modified by tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802) or by tbe Sixth Protocol to tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for manufactures of metal; tbe items marked “B” or “JP” at 13% percent under tbe provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; tbe items marked “C” at 15 percent under tbe provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 51802, for metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; tbe items [175]*175marked. “D” at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for transformers; and the items marked “E” at the appropriate rate of duty, depending upon the date of entry, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802 or T.D. 54108, for manufactures of metal, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc.
47 C.C.P.A. 137 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Cust. Ct. 174, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-e-merzbach-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.