Charles E. McDowell v. Arthur Calderon, Warden
187 F.3d 1160, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10009, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7887, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23515, 1999 WL 766290
This text of 187 F.3d 1160 (Charles E. McDowell v. Arthur Calderon, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Charles E. McDowell v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, 187 F.3d 1160, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10009, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7887, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23515, 1999 WL 766290 (9th Cir. 1999).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion McDowell v. Calderon, 173 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir.1999), is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Charles E. McDOWELL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
173 F.3d 1186 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 F.3d 1160, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10009, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7887, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 23515, 1999 WL 766290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-e-mcdowell-v-arthur-calderon-warden-ca9-1999.