Charles E. Floyd v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
This text of 450 F.2d 937 (Charles E. Floyd v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles E. FLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-2014 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 18, 1971.
Irvin J. Langford, Jr., Mobile, Ala., James R. Owen, Bay Minette, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.
Brock B. Gordon, E. Watson Smith, Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellee; Johnstone, Adams, May, Howard & Hill, Mobile, Ala., of counsel.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F.2d 937, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-e-floyd-v-connecticut-general-life-insuran-ca5-1971.