Charles E. Englert v. Lustrewood Process Co., Inc.
This text of 230 F.2d 611 (Charles E. Englert v. Lustrewood Process Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
230 F.2d 611
Charles E. ENGLERT, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
LUSTREWOOD PROCESS CO., Inc., Defendant, Appellee.
No. 5079.
United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.
March 16, 1956.
Wendell F. Grimes, Boston, Mass., with whom Martin J. Hansberry, Waltham, Mass., was on brief, for appellant.
James W. Kelleher, Boston, Mass., with whom Edward O. Proctor, Jr., and Dever & Proctor, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for appellee.
Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 F.2d 611, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-e-englert-v-lustrewood-process-co-inc-ca1-1956.