Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2017

Docket2017 NYSlipOp 51189(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co. (Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Luc Jean Baptiste, Appellant,

against

New South Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered May 29, 2014. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff's arguments as to defendant's cross motion either lack merit (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]), or are not properly before this court, as they are being raised for the first time on appeal (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]; Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v Elrac, Inc., 48 Misc 3d 139[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51219[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 15, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Luc Jean Baptiste, Appellant,

against

New South Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered May 29, 2014. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff's arguments as to defendant's cross motion either lack merit (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]), or are not properly before this court, as they are being raised for the first time on appeal (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]; Mind & Body Acupuncture, P.C. v Elrac, Inc., 48 Misc 3d 139[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51219[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 15, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-deng-acupuncture-pc-v-new-s-ins-co-nyappterm-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack