Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. ELRAC, Inc.
This text of Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. ELRAC, Inc. (Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. ELRAC, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
ELRAC, Inc., Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Joseph D. DePalma, Esq.), for appellant. Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered July 1, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services billed under CPT codes 97810 and 97811.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.
For the reasons stated in Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Gomez, Sarae v ELRAC, Inc. (__ Misc 3d __, 2017 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2014-1869 Q C]), decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: September 08, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. ELRAC, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-deng-acupuncture-pc-v-elrac-inc-nyappterm-2017.