Charles De Greck & Co. v. Murphy & Gairns

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 94
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 1, 1880
DocketNo. 6557
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 94 (Charles De Greck & Co. v. Murphy & Gairns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles De Greck & Co. v. Murphy & Gairns, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 94 (La. 1880).

Opinion

De Blanc, J.

In this case a motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the grounds, (1) that the transcript does not contain the record of the succession of Thomas R. Sutton, offered in evidence by the plaintiffs; (2) that the clerk’s certificate is wanting in every legal requisite.

The record referred to in appellee’s motion was not copied in the transcript; the certificate of the clerk is but a list and description of documents, and no application was made to have the transcript completed and the error corrected.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-de-greck-co-v-murphy-gairns-la-1880.