Charles D. Shimola v. City of Cleveland
This text of 772 F.2d 908 (Charles D. Shimola v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CHARLES D. SHIMOLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF CLEVELAND, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
NO. 84-3631
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
8/21/85
N.D.Ohio
AFFIRMED
ORDER
BEFORE: LIVELY, Chief Judge; and MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges.
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed upon the opinion of the District Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 F.2d 908, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22917, 1985 WL 13591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-d-shimola-v-city-of-cleveland-ca6-1985.