Charles D. Shimola v. City of Cleveland

772 F.2d 908, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22917, 1985 WL 13591
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 21, 1985·No. 84-3631·Unpublished

Opinion

772 F.2d 908

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CHARLES D. SHIMOLA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF CLEVELAND, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

NO. 84-3631

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

8/21/85

N.D.Ohio

AFFIRMED

ORDER

BEFORE: LIVELY, Chief Judge; and MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges.

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed upon the opinion of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles D. Shimola v. City of Cleveland, 772 F.2d 908, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22917, 1985 WL 13591 (6th Cir. 1985).

772 F.2d 908 (Charles D. Shimola v. City of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salaam v. Davis
772 F.2d 908 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)