Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America

Ninth Circuit

Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America

191 F.2d 401

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 1, 1951·No. 12846_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case deficiencies in income taxes were assessed against appellant on the Commissioner’s determination that amounts received from two alleged partnerships reported in the tax returns of appellant’s wife should be taxed to appellant. The latter, having paid the assessments, sued unsuccessfully to recover. The court’s findings and decision are abundantly supported by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case deficiencies in income taxes were assessed against appellant on the Commissioner’s determination that amounts received from two alleged partnerships reported in the tax returns of appellant’s wife should be taxed to appellant. The latter, having paid the assessments, sued unsuccessfully to recover. The court’s findings and decision are abundantly supported by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.

Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America, 191 F.2d 401 (9th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

191 F.2d 401 (Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.