Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America

191 F.2d 401
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 1951
Docket12846_1
StatusPublished

This text of 191 F.2d 401 (Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles D. Bronson, Jr. v. Hugh Earle, Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Oregon and United States of America, 191 F.2d 401 (9th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case deficiencies in income taxes were assessed against appellant on the Commissioner’s determination that amounts received from two alleged partnerships reported in the tax returns of appellant’s wife should be taxed to appellant. The latter, having paid the assessments, sued unsuccessfully to recover. The court’s findings and decision are abundantly supported by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 F.2d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-d-bronson-jr-v-hugh-earle-collector-of-internal-revenue-for-ca9-1951.