Charles Crowell v. Parker Evatt

Fourth Circuit

Charles Crowell v. Parker Evatt

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11008, 1995 WL 105300

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1995

Docket94-7212

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Charles Crowell v. Parker Evatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Crowell v. Parker Evatt, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11008, 1995 WL 105300 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles CROWELL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-7212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crowell v. Evatt, No. CA-94-2549-3-19-A (D.S.C. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles CROWELL, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-7212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crowell v. Evatt, No. CA-94-2549-3-19-A (D.S.C. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11008, 1995 WL 105300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-crowell-v-parker-evatt-ca4-1995.