Charles Clyde Ingram v. State
This text of Charles Clyde Ingram v. State (Charles Clyde Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-19-00072-CR
CHARLES CLYDE INGRAM, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 173rd District Court Henderson County, Texas Trial Court No. CR16-0711-173
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they
contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and
the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P.
9.10(a)(3). Sensitive data also includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social
security number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification
number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains a social security number.
Volumes five, twelve, fifteen through eighteen, twenty, and twenty-one, together with the
supplemental and second supplemental reporter’s records, including Exhibits A, 3A, and 3B,
contain the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule
9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court,
including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
clerk’s record and volumes five, twelve, fifteen through eighteen, twenty, and twenty-one, together
with the supplemental and second supplemental reporter’s records, including Exhibits A, 3A,
and 3B, contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance
with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and the enumerated portions of the
reporter’s record.
2 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: November 19, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Clyde Ingram v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-clyde-ingram-v-state-texapp-2019.