Charles Clyde Ingram v. State

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00072-CR

CHARLES CLYDE INGRAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 173rd District Court Henderson County, Texas Trial Court No. CR16-0711-173

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER Our review of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case indicates that they

contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and

the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P.

9.10(a)(3). Sensitive data also includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social

security number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification

number.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains a social security number.

Volumes five, twelve, fifteen through eighteen, twenty, and twenty-one, together with the

supplemental and second supplemental reporter’s records, including Exhibits A, 3A, and 3B,

contain the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule

9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court,

including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the

clerk’s record and volumes five, twelve, fifteen through eighteen, twenty, and twenty-one, together

with the supplemental and second supplemental reporter’s records, including Exhibits A, 3A,

and 3B, contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance

with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and the enumerated portions of the

reporter’s record.

2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: November 19, 2019