Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder
This text of Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder (Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 29, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00164-CV
CHARLES “CHUCK” ZUBARIK, Appellant V. FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, MARIANNE GONZALEZ, THE FIRST AMENDED PHILLIPS FAMILY TRUST, RONI HENDERSON, ERIC SORENSEN, JAMIE SORENSEN, DAVID SMELSER, AND LINDSAY SMELSER, Appellees
On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-18220
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant appeals from the trial court’s March 15, 2021 order vacating its
severance order signed on December 4, 2020. We questioned our jurisdiction over
this appeal because the order vacating a severance order is neither a final judgment
nor an appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d
191, 195 (Tex. 2001); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a). At our
request, the parties filed letter briefs addressing the jurisdictional issue. In his letter brief, appellant, rather than addressing the question posed –
whether the order vacating the severance order is final or otherwise appealable –
addresses the merits as to why the trial court erred in signing that order. Nothing in
appellant’s letter brief demonstrates that we have jurisdiction to review an order
vacating a severance order.
The order vacating the severance order is neither a final judgment nor an
appealable interlocutory order. For this reason, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
210164F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
CHARLES “CHUCK” ZUBARIK, On Appeal from the 68th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-18220. No. 05-21-00164-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, Goldstein participating. MARIANNE GONZALEZ, THE FIRST AMENDED PHILLIPS FAMILY TRUST, RONI HENDERSON, ERIC SORENSEN, JAMIE SORENSEN, DAVID SMELSER, AND LINDSAY SMELSER, Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellees FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, MARIANNE GONZALEZ, THE FIRST AMENDED PHILLIPS FAMILY TRUST, RONI HENDERSON, ERIC SORENSEN, JAMIE SORENSEN, DAVID SMELSER, AND LINDSAY SMELSER recover their costs of this appeal from appellant CHARLES “CHUCK” ZUBARIK.
Judgment entered July 29, 2021.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles "Chuck" Zubarik v. Francisco and Marianne Gonzalez, Roni Henderson, the First Amended Phillips Family Trust, Eric Sorensen, Jamie Sorensen, David Smelder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-chuck-zubarik-v-francisco-and-marianne-gonzalez-roni-henderson-texapp-2021.