Charles Carey v. Hi-Lo Auto Supply, LP D/B/A O'Reilly Auto Parts and O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
This text of Charles Carey v. Hi-Lo Auto Supply, LP D/B/A O'Reilly Auto Parts and O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. (Charles Carey v. Hi-Lo Auto Supply, LP D/B/A O'Reilly Auto Parts and O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00345-CV
Charles Carey § From the 352nd District Court
§ of Tarrant County (352-268403-13) v. § June 9, 2016
Hi-Lo Auto Supply, LP d/b/a O'Reilly § Opinion by Justice Gabriel Auto Parts and O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that
there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of
the trial court is affirmed.
It is further ordered that appellant Charles Carey shall bear the costs of
this appeal, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Lee Gabriel Justice Lee Gabriel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Carey v. Hi-Lo Auto Supply, LP D/B/A O'Reilly Auto Parts and O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-carey-v-hi-lo-auto-supply-lp-dba-oreilly-auto-parts-and-texapp-2016.