Charles Cantrell Wright v. United States
This text of 376 F.2d 153 (Charles Cantrell Wright v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2312 and 2313, by transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce, knowing the same to have been stolen, and by receiving the vehicle. •
The sole contention of error is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment of conviction entered thereon. We disagree. The evidence was more than ample.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 F.2d 153, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-cantrell-wright-v-united-states-ca5-1967.