Charles Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises

West Virginia Supreme Court

Charles Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises

DecidedAugust 27, 2024

Docket23-171

StatusPublished

This text of Charles Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises (Charles Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises, (W. Va. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Charles Canaday, August 27, 2024 Claimant Below, Petitioner C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA v.) No. 23-171 (JCN: 2019026301) (ICA No. 22-ICA-170)

Jane Lee Enterprises, Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Charles Canaday appeals the February 2, 2023, memorandum decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia (“ICA”). See Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises, No. 22-ICA-170, 2023 WL 1464103 (W. Va. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2023) (memorandum decision). Respondent Jane Lee Enterprises, Inc. filed a timely response.1 The issue on appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, which affirmed the claim administrator’s August 26, 2021, order granting the petitioner an award of 20% permanent partial disability for occupational pneumoconiosis.

The petitioner asserts that the West Virginia Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board erred in finding that the majority of his pulmonary impairment was due to his smoking history instead of occupational pneumoconiosis. The employer maintains that the petitioner points to no erroneous procedure, no arbitrary or capricious conclusions, no abuse of discretion, or jurisdictional error by the tribunals below.

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).

Affirmed.

1 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori Withrow. The respondent is represented by counsel Mark J. Grigoraci. 1 ISSUED: August 27, 2024

CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead Justice Elizabeth D. Walker Justice John A. Hutchison Justice William R. Wooton Justice C. Haley Bunn

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Charles Canaday, August 27, 2024 Claimant Below, Petitioner C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA v.) No. 23-171 (JCN: 2019026301) (ICA No. 22-ICA-170)

Jane Lee Enterprises, Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Charles Canaday appeals the February 2, 2023, memorandum decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia (“ICA”). See Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises, No. 22-ICA-170, 2023 WL 1464103 (W. Va. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2023) (memorandum decision). Respondent Jane Lee Enterprises, Inc. filed a timely response.1 The issue on appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, which affirmed the claim administrator’s August 26, 2021, order granting the petitioner an award of 20% permanent partial disability for occupational pneumoconiosis.

The petitioner asserts that the West Virginia Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board erred in finding that the majority of his pulmonary impairment was due to his smoking history instead of occupational pneumoconiosis. The employer maintains that the petitioner points to no erroneous procedure, no arbitrary or capricious conclusions, no abuse of discretion, or jurisdictional error by the tribunals below.

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).

Affirmed.

1 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori Withrow. The respondent is represented by counsel Mark J. Grigoraci. 1 ISSUED: August 27, 2024

CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead Justice Elizabeth D. Walker Justice John A. Hutchison Justice William R. Wooton Justice C. Haley Bunn

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Charles Canaday v. Jane Lee Enterprises, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-canaday-v-jane-lee-enterprises-wva-2024.