Charles Calvin Campbell v. United States

401 F.2d 894
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 31, 1968·No. 25657·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Calvin Campbell was found guilty by a jury under a two-count indictment charging that he transported in interstate commerce two falsely made and altered customer’s drafts with knowledge that they were falsely made and altered in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment under each count, the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

Appellant’s sole specification of error is that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. His defense was conducted by retained counsel of his own choosing. Although the record reveals counsel’s inexperience as a trial lawyer and his unfamiharity with certain rules of evidence and trial procedure, we conclude that when measured by the applicable standard, appellant’s representation was adequate. Where inadequacy of counsel is alleged, relief may be obtained only when representation is so inadequate as to make the trial a farce and a mockery of justice, United States v. Garguilo, 324 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1963), or when there has been a denial of fundamental fairness, Brubaker v. Dickson, 310 F.2d 30 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 978, 83 S.Ct. 1110, 10 L.Ed.2d 143 (1963).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Calvin Campbell v. United States, 401 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1968).

401 F.2d 894 (Charles Calvin Campbell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coney v. State
491 S.W.2d 501 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1973)
Johnson v. State
478 S.W.2d 954 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Vasquez v. State
477 S.W.2d 629 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Brooks v. State
473 S.W.2d 30 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
State v. Caffey
457 S.W.2d 657 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)