Charles C. Reyes v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden California State Prison, San Quentin, California

422 F.2d 1316, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10198
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 1970
Docket22972_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 F.2d 1316 (Charles C. Reyes v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden California State Prison, San Quentin, California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles C. Reyes v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden California State Prison, San Quentin, California, 422 F.2d 1316, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10198 (9th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a state prisoner, appeals from a district court denial of his petition for habeas corpus, based upon (a) an alleged unknowledgeable plea of guilty, and (b) ineffective assistance of counsel.

The district court held an extensive evidentiary hearing, and denied relief (C.T., Vol. I, p. 157).

*1317 Appellant had been charged in the state courts of California with four counts of rape, four counts of burglary, one count of assault to commit rape, one count of kidnapping, three counts of kidnapping for the purpose of robbery, three counts of robbery, and two counts of attempted robbery. He pleaded guilty to eleven counts; seven were dismissed. Appellant had confessed all counts, and his attorney was convinced this confession was free, voluntary, and uncoerced. Appellant was told he had no defense, and that a guilty plea would insure that “some counts” would be dismissed. The district court found the pleas entered freely and voluntarily, with understanding of the nature of the charges and the consequences thereof. It found appellant’s attorney was an experienced and capable public defender, and that appellant’s defense had been fully adequate and “effective.”

We find no basis for overturning the district court’s careful conclusions and factual findings, nor its denial of the petition for habeas corpus.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon Lee Wilkins v. Donald R. Erickson, Warden
505 F.2d 761 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 F.2d 1316, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-c-reyes-v-lawrence-e-wilson-warden-california-state-prison-san-ca9-1970.