Charles C. Grigg v. United States
262 F.2d 20
Opinion
This is a narcotics case in which appellant complains that the court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit on redirect examination certain information damaging to him, and which he denied. The jury decided the issue of credibility against him. While the evidence on the whole was rather weak, we think it was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles C. Grigg v. United States, 262 F.2d 20 (D.C. Cir. 1959).
262 F.2d 20 (Charles C. Grigg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornelius H. Doherty v. David G. Bress
262 F.2d 20 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)