Charles C. Brawley v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Charles C. Brawley v. United States

463 F.2d 422, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7799

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 1972

Docket72-1418

StatusPublished

This text of 463 F.2d 422 (Charles C. Brawley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles C. Brawley v. United States, 463 F.2d 422, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7799 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21, 2

1

. Appellant alleged as grounds for relief that (1) he was indicted by an illegally constituted grand jury; (2) he did not sign a waiver of counsel form in open court; (3) he was subjected to an illegal arrest, search, and seizure; and (4) the trial court did not comply with Rule 11, F.R.Crim.P., when it failed to inquire sua sponte, into the validity of the search and seizure.

2

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21, 2

1

. Appellant alleged as grounds for relief that (1) he was indicted by an illegally constituted grand jury; (2) he did not sign a waiver of counsel form in open court; (3) he was subjected to an illegal arrest, search, and seizure; and (4) the trial court did not comply with Rule 11, F.R.Crim.P., when it failed to inquire sua sponte, into the validity of the search and seizure.

2

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 F.2d 422, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-c-brawley-v-united-states-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack