Charles Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-3632

___________________________

Charles L. Burgett

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

Submitted: July 26, 2023 Filed: August 1, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Burgett appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. Upon careful

1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Burgett’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. See Schoffstall v. Henderson, 223 F.3d 818, 827 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________