Charles Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi
This text of Charles Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi (Charles Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-3632 ___________________________
Charles L. Burgett
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: July 26, 2023 Filed: August 1, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Burgett appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. Upon careful
1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. review of the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment). We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Burgett’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. See Schoffstall v. Henderson, 223 F.3d 818, 827 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Burgett v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-burgett-v-kilolo-kijakazi-ca8-2023.