Charles Burgett v. Frank Bisignano

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 13, 2026·No. 25-3165·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 25-3165

Charles L. Burgett

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

Submitted: August 10, 2026 Filed: August 13, 2026

[Unpublished]

Before KELLY, KOBES, and JUSTIN D. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Burgett appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. After careful review of

1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Burgett’s motion for reconsideration. See Ryan v. Ryan, 889 F.3d 499, 507-08 (8th Cir. 2018) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Burgett v. Frank Bisignano, (8th Cir. 2026).

Charles Burgett v. Frank Bisignano (Charles Burgett v. Frank Bisignano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stacy Ryan v. Constance Ryan
889 F.3d 499 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Sameh Said v. Mayo Clinic
44 F.4th 1142 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)