Charles Branton v. Parish of St. Tammany and St. Tammany Parish Council
This text of Charles Branton v. Parish of St. Tammany and St. Tammany Parish Council (Charles Branton v. Parish of St. Tammany and St. Tammany Parish Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CHARLES BRANTON NO. 2021 CW 1295
VERSUS PAGE 1 OF 2
PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY AND ST. TAMMANY PARISH COUNCIL
CONSOLIDATED WITH
JOHN G. RAYMOND
VERSUS
NOVEMBER 18, 2021 PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY AND ST. TAMMANY PARISH COUNCIL
In Re: John G. Raymond, applying for supervisory writs,
22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, Nos. 2021- 12864 c/ w 2021- 12868.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY, WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s October 20, 2021 judgment the exception sustaining of prematurity and dismissing plaintiff' s, John G. Raymond, claims seeking injunction is reversed. In the dilatory exception raising the objection of
prematurity, the exceptor bears the initial burden of showing that an administrative remedy or procedure applies, by reason of which the lawsuit is premature. Once the existence of an
administrative remedy is established, the burden then shifts
to the plaintiff to show that the specific administrative
remedy or procedure has been exhausted. Dutrey v. Plaquemine Manor Nursing Home, 2012- 1295 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 17/ 13), 205 So. 3d 934, 941. We find that defendant, St. Parish, Tammany failed to carry its burden of proof. We further find that as Mr. Raymond' s lawsuit is to enjoin the call of this election
due to the alleged unconstitutionality of the process in which the election was called and the proposed referendum placed on the ballot rather than the prospective result of the election, Mr. Raymond may petition the court for an injunction prior to the election, the merits of which should be determined prior to the election. See Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94- 2015 ( La. 11/ 30/ 94), 646 So. 2d 885, 888 n. 4; Premier Games, Inc. v. State, 99- 1297 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 7/ 99), 739 So. 2d 852 ( per curiam), writs denied, 99- 1710, 99- 1679 ( La. 6/ 14/ 99), 745 So. 2d 15, 604, cert. denied, 528 U. S. 1062, 120 S. Ct. 617, 145 L. Ed. 2d 512 ( 1999).
VGW JMG
JEW WRC
Holdridge, J., dissents and would deny the writ. If the vote for the proposition fails, the issue is moot. STATE OF LOUISIANA
2021 CW 1295
PAGE 2 OF 2
Accordingly, the constitutionality of the election should not
be tested until after the election. If the proposition passes, then plaintiff may seek injunctive relief to enjoin the
enforcement of the proposition.
1/
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Branton v. Parish of St. Tammany and St. Tammany Parish Council, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-branton-v-parish-of-st-tammany-and-st-tammany-parish-council-lactapp-2021.