Charles Boren, of the Estate of William T. Dudley Jr. v. Matthew Dudley, as the Independent of the Estate of Francille B. Dudley, and Trustee of the Francille B. Dudley Revocable Trust

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2022
Docket13-22-00012-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Charles Boren, of the Estate of William T. Dudley Jr. v. Matthew Dudley, as the Independent of the Estate of Francille B. Dudley, and Trustee of the Francille B. Dudley Revocable Trust (Charles Boren, of the Estate of William T. Dudley Jr. v. Matthew Dudley, as the Independent of the Estate of Francille B. Dudley, and Trustee of the Francille B. Dudley Revocable Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Boren, of the Estate of William T. Dudley Jr. v. Matthew Dudley, as the Independent of the Estate of Francille B. Dudley, and Trustee of the Francille B. Dudley Revocable Trust, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00012-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

CHARLES BOREN, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM T. DUDLEY JR., DECEASED, Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW DUDLEY, AS THE INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FRANCILLE B. DUDLEY, DECEASED AND TRUSTEE OF THE FRANCILLE B. DUDLEY REVOCABLE TRUST, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the

appeal. Appellant requests the dismissal, as the appellant no longer desires to challenge

the order granting the bill of review.

The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should

be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted,

and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the

appellant."). Because the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s request, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of April, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles Boren, of the Estate of William T. Dudley Jr. v. Matthew Dudley, as the Independent of the Estate of Francille B. Dudley, and Trustee of the Francille B. Dudley Revocable Trust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-boren-of-the-estate-of-william-t-dudley-jr-v-matthew-dudley-as-texapp-2022.