Charles B. Chrystal Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Charles B. Chrystal Co. v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 425, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1366

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 20, 1951

DocketNo. 8041; Entry No. 713897

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 425 (Charles B. Chrystal Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles B. Chrystal Co. v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 425, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1366 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the value found by the appraiser on 300 bags (66,300 pounds) of talc imported from Manchuria. It was invoiced at United States $0.97 per 100 pounds and entered at the same price, less nondutiable charges. The appraiser found the value to be Japanese yen 46 per ton net, packed.

At the hearing counsel for the plaintiff submitted the case on the record without the introduction of any evidence. From an examination of the papers in this case I find that the value returned by the appraiser, which is presumptively correct, has not been overcome.Judgment will be entered accordingly in favor of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the value found by the appraiser on 300 bags (66,300 pounds) of talc imported from Manchuria. It was invoiced at United States $0.97 per 100 pounds and entered at the same price, less nondutiable charges. The appraiser found the value to be Japanese yen 46 per ton net, packed.

At the hearing counsel for the plaintiff submitted the case on the record without the introduction of any evidence. From an examination of the papers in this case I find that the value returned by the appraiser, which is presumptively correct, has not been overcome.Judgment will be entered accordingly in favor of the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Cust. Ct. 425, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-b-chrystal-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.