Charles Ashford v. Ray Hobbs

363 F. App'x 423
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2010
Docket09-2379
StatusUnpublished

This text of 363 F. App'x 423 (Charles Ashford v. Ray Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Ashford v. Ray Hobbs, 363 F. App'x 423 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

*424 PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Charles Ashford appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) and Ray Hobbs. 2 Upon de novo review, see Saunders v. Fanners Ins. Exch., 537 F.3d 961, 963 (8th Cir.2008), we find no basis for reversal and accordingly affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United Stales District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

. The caption lists Hobbs as "Chief Director” of the ADC, apparently because that is what Ashford called Hobbs in his complaint. In its brief on appeal, the ADC refers to Hobbs as the "Deputy Director.” The discrepancy about Hobbs's job title makes no difference to our analysis, so we need not resolve it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saunders v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
537 F.3d 961 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 F. App'x 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-ashford-v-ray-hobbs-ca8-2010.