Charles Armwood v. Franklin K. Brough, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary

Fourth Circuit

Charles Armwood v. Franklin K. Brough, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary

359 F.2d 854, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6355

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 1966

Docket10377

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 F.2d 854 (Charles Armwood v. Franklin K. Brough, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Armwood v. Franklin K. Brough, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 359 F.2d 854, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6355 (4th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus was sought by this Maryland prisoner on the basis of asserted illegality of a search of his apartment. The District Judge, at the conclusion of a plenary hearing, resolved certain contested issues of fact and concluded that the search was lawful because the defendant freely and voluntarily consented to it.

Under all the circumstances, we cannot say that finding was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus was sought by this Maryland prisoner on the basis of asserted illegality of a search of his apartment. The District Judge, at the conclusion of a plenary hearing, resolved certain contested issues of fact and concluded that the search was lawful because the defendant freely and voluntarily consented to it.

Under all the circumstances, we cannot say that finding was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 F.2d 854, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-armwood-v-franklin-k-brough-warden-maryland-penitentiary-ca4-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack