Charles Anthony Malouff, Jr. v. State

Opinion

.i^j^ciBrjza^

doo^r c>f &99&iuu4> Tkng-t? C>^^v^cx 6pT©<P^ f?P. gxsx tZg-4"7 .Austin!.,..T^. /7©*1ii

"T£pA*L Couru-r Cj\<?<£ M<? : _p .•1 •> p£.-i^ "^cfHofciM/iysXzflJS N JSTOgyf)imcgtt0^

^

fl-^Afre: -£g»p w^e j ^ ^ - i ^ ^^rj:_ caio Rgpw flg£ogC>*t^<£>W At^P -^opgy^ocy T\»v>eL.v.

5"-rv-^ uv <rwjst T**e_&y$x> o^ <r, _. for. the ^o^nst. th^

#"N

AL-^ it i$- m^ onc^evKrAiUDfvo^ o^oga. Apo-, LOST

.!Tev_, CpQs Cgirvv.. Pe.cc.v Ei&>H-7*b (DF- g7fcg toci^tg/7, x:

|1S y&ju-> C^F *^M£> 16 PP^l^LE^ A.r^C? 3_7 |0©§T? TO ^\Jfe'_ Wirv A^lr^r £><?- g^rotlH UiA&£A>lT ££#. A£pg:A&A^<C PyEft^EL. kOO^Jf jv\i2 ^>o "IPWvT ;r ^v^ 6x£T- T^uec? A6 ^ocnT A.-b

/pv TfrA^K ^DQ fbP-. Voya A^l^TyU43g Al^K7 Gp^iQgg^T7flhS-

^CCTpjlIV'

04A*nJ§3 A. WA/U-CU;=F a&- ~l&x?to \c\ -7 <g> 5^ o

feWf^O \jKiiT <S-*l£- lO

Hv.i_______\u-e,,. ~H 1_a3XO

iC t e ** 15 :

^

*4'

» -4 >•3

3

3

V*

?3 ^ 0<v

%

a)

in .1.-:, •\l .i:.-. ••..I

•s?

K

r