Charles and Renate Freese v. Corning Glass Works

770 F.2d 165, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14244, 1985 WL 13475
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 17, 1985·No. 83-1814·Unpublished

Opinion

770 F.2d 165

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
CHARLES AND RENATE FREESE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CORNING GLASS WORKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

NO. 83-1814

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

7/17/85

E.D.Mich.

AFFIRMED

ORDER

BEFORE: LIVELY, Chief Circuit Judge; MERRITT and CONTIE, Circuit Judges.

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles and Renate Freese v. Corning Glass Works, 770 F.2d 165, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14244, 1985 WL 13475 (6th Cir. 1985).

770 F.2d 165 (Charles and Renate Freese v. Corning Glass Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grand Jury Investigation No. 84-2-86-190, in Re
770 F.2d 165 (Sixth Circuit, 1985)