Charles Amusement Co. v. Eckensperger
This text of 121 A.D. 930 (Charles Amusement Co. v. Eckensperger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed,, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. .Held, that it appearing by statements of counsel made in open court that the plaintiff has ceased to carry oh the business which the sheriff was restrained from interfering with, and' that the parties have entered upon the trial, of the issues and that the action may be determined upon the merits before thé commencement of the next season, the- questions of law involved should not be determined upon this motion, hut on an appeal from the judgment. AH concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 A.D. 930, 106 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-amusement-co-v-eckensperger-nyappdiv-1907.