Charles Albert Deloach v. United States

387 F.2d 145
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 1968
Docket24201_1
StatusPublished

This text of 387 F.2d 145 (Charles Albert Deloach v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Albert Deloach v. United States, 387 F.2d 145 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Deloach (Appellant) was indicted on three counts of knowingly attempting to evade and defeat a large part of the income tax due and owing by him to the United States in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 7201. The case was tried before a jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on Appellant’s plea of not guilty. He was convicted and sentenced to concurrent three-year terms on each count. From his conviction and sentence, Appellant has prosecuted this appeal.

The Appellant contends that the trial judge committed reversible error in his instructions to the jury by (1) incorrectly charging upon the definition of the word “wilfully” as used in 26 U.S.C.A. § 7201, and (2) charging the jury with respect to the burden of proof' or the obligation of Appellant to go forward with the evidence concerning certain claimed additional deductions and exclusions over and above those listed on his income tax return. We have read the charges complained about and when considered as a whole as applied to the facts of this case, we do not find the instructions erroneous. See Spies v. United States, 1943, 317 U.S. 492, 63 S.Ct. 364, 87 L.Ed. 418; United States v. Campbell (2 Cir. 1965), 351 F.2d 336; Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz (5 Cir. 1964), 334 F.2d 262; United States v. Shavin (7 Cir. 1963), 320 F.2d 308; Elwert v. United States (9 Cir. 1956), 231 F.2d 928; United States v. Bender (7 Cir. 1955), 218 F.2d 869; Clark v. United States (8 Cir. 1954), 211 F.2d 100; United States v. Link (3 Cir. 1953), 202 F.2d 592.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spies v. United States
317 U.S. 492 (Supreme Court, 1943)
United States v. Link
202 F.2d 592 (Third Circuit, 1953)
Clark v. United States
211 F.2d 100 (Eighth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Abe Bender
218 F.2d 869 (Seventh Circuit, 1955)
Leo Elwert v. United States
231 F.2d 928 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)
United States v. Nathan Shavin
320 F.2d 308 (Seventh Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Ernest O. D. Campbell
351 F.2d 336 (Second Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
387 F.2d 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-albert-deloach-v-united-states-ca5-1968.