Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816

800 F.2d 461, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31586
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 17, 1986·No. 85-2860·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A few months ago Charles A. George was here contending that the Texas law prohibiting prostitution was unconstitutional. George v. State of Texas, 788 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir.1986). Now he contends that the 55 mile per hour speed limit is unconstitutional (but not on a two lane two way highway). He argues that all violators are not apprehended and that. enforcement would be unsafe. We find no constitutional issue raised in anything Mr. George says. No more does he have a right to drive over 55 mph guaranteed by the United States Constitution than does he have a *462 “right to sex” as urged by his previous appeal. The appeal is frivolous and double costs are awarded pursuant to Fed.R. App.P. 38.

AFFIRMED. DOUBLE COSTS AWARDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816, 800 F.2d 461, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31586 (5th Cir. 1986).

800 F.2d 461 (Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles A. George v. State of Texas
788 F.2d 1099 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)