Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816

Fifth Circuit

Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816

800 F.2d 461, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31586

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 1986

Docket85-2860

StatusPublished

This text of 800 F.2d 461 (Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles A. George v. City of Patton Village, Officer Hauford Identification Number 4816, 800 F.2d 461, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31586 (5th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A few months ago Charles A. George was here contending that the Texas law prohibiting prostitution was unconstitutional. George v. State of Texas, 788 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir.1986). Now he contends that the 55 mile per hour speed limit is unconstitutional (but not on a two lane two way highway). He argues that all violators are not apprehended and that. enforcement would be unsafe. We find no constitutional issue raised in anything Mr. George says. No more does he have a right to drive over 55 mph guaranteed by the United States Constitution than does he have a *462 “right to sex” as urged by his previous appeal. The appeal is frivolous and double costs are awarded pursuant to Fed.R. App.P. 38.

AFFIRMED. DOUBLE COSTS AWARDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

A few months ago Charles A. George was here contending that the Texas law prohibiting prostitution was unconstitutional. George v. State of Texas, 788 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir.1986). Now he contends that the 55 mile per hour speed limit is unconstitutional (but not on a two lane two way highway). He argues that all violators are not apprehended and that. enforcement would be unsafe. We find no constitutional issue raised in anything Mr. George says. No more does he have a right to drive over 55 mph guaranteed by the United States Constitution than does he have a *462 “right to sex” as urged by his previous appeal. The appeal is frivolous and double costs are awarded pursuant to Fed.R. App.P. 38.

AFFIRMED. DOUBLE COSTS AWARDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

800 F.2d 461, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-a-george-v-city-of-patton-village-officer-hauford-identification-ca5-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack