Charles A. Allen v. Parris N. Glendening Kurt L. Schmoke Alvin C. Collins

Fourth Circuit

Charles A. Allen v. Parris N. Glendening Kurt L. Schmoke Alvin C. Collins

74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39017, 1996 WL 23326

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

Docket95-2497

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1230 (Charles A. Allen v. Parris N. Glendening Kurt L. Schmoke Alvin C. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles A. Allen v. Parris N. Glendening Kurt L. Schmoke Alvin C. Collins, 74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39017, 1996 WL 23326 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles A. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parris N. GLENDENING; Kurt L. Schmoke; Alvin C. Collins,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2497.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Charles A. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Steven David Keller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD; William Rowe Phelan, Jr., Office of the City Solicitor, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Glendening, No. CA-95-1960-S (D.Md. July 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles A. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parris N. GLENDENING; Kurt L. Schmoke; Alvin C. Collins,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2497.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Charles A. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Steven David Keller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD; William Rowe Phelan, Jr., Office of the City Solicitor, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Glendening, No. CA-95-1960-S (D.Md. July 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39017, 1996 WL 23326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-a-allen-v-parris-n-glendening-kurt-l-schmo-ca4-1996.