Charity v. Potter

Fourth Circuit

Charity v. Potter

115 F. App'x 135

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2004·No. No. 04-2134·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Annette Charity appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster General in her civil action challenging the non-renewal of her term of employment with the U.S. Postal Service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Charity v. Potter, No. CA-03-988 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Annette Charity appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster General in her civil action challenging the non-renewal of her term of employment with the U.S. Postal Service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Charity v. Potter, No. CA-03-988 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Charity v. Potter, 115 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

115 F. App'x 135 (Charity v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.