Charity v. Potter

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 2004
Docket04-2134
StatusUnpublished

This text of Charity v. Potter (Charity v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charity v. Potter, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2134

ANNETTE CHARITY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-988)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Annette Charity, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Christopher John Burton, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Annette Charity appeals the district court’s order

awarding summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster General in her

civil action challenging the non-renewal of her term of employment

with the U.S. Postal Service. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Charity v. Potter, No. CA-03-988 (E.D.

Va. July 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charity v. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charity-v-potter-ca4-2004.