Charif v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

77 F. App'x 656
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2003·No. No. 03-6893·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wadgy Charif appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). Charif also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Charif v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-265-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7, 2003 & entered Apr. 8, 2003; filed May 12, 2003 & entered May 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charif v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 77 F. App'x 656 (4th Cir. 2003).

77 F. App'x 656 (Charif v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related