Charge to Grand Jury—Neutrality Laws

30 F. Cas. 1018, 2 McLean 1
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
DecidedDecember 15, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 F. Cas. 1018 (Charge to Grand Jury—Neutrality Laws) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charge to Grand Jury—Neutrality Laws, 30 F. Cas. 1018, 2 McLean 1 (circtdoh 1838).

Opinion

McLEAN, Circuit Judge

(charging grand jury). Your particular and most serious attention is requested to the provisions of an act entitled “An act' to punish certain offences against the United States” [3 Stat. 447]. By the first section of this act, it is declared, “that if any citizen of the United States shall, within the territory or jurisdiction thereof, accept and exercise a commission to serve a foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people, with whom the United States are at peace, he shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and be fined not more than two thousand dollars, and imprisoned not exceeding three years.” And in the sixth section, it is provided, “that if any person shall, within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States, begin to set on foot, or provide or prepare the means for, any military expedition or enterprise to be carried on from thence, against the territory or dominion of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people, with whom the United States are at peace, every person, so offending, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall • be fined not exceeding three thousand dollars, and imprisoned not more than three years.” There are many other acts prohibited by this law, which relate to foreign powers, and which may be presented for your examination; but the above sections are considered the most important. The offence in the first section consists in “accepting and exercising a commission,” to carry on war against any people or state with whom we are at peace. The commission may be conferred by any district of country, or association of people, whose right to confer it shall be recognized by the person appointed. And it is immaterial whether the commission has been conferred by the popular voice, or by the representatives of such district, or association of people. It must have been accepted and exercised, to come within your jurisdiction, within this state, by a citizen of the United States. Some overt act, under the commission, must be done; such as raising men for the enterprise, collecting provisions, munitions of war, or any other act which shows an exercise of the authority which the commission is supposed to confer. Under the ninth section, the offence consists in beginning to set on foot, or providing or preparing the means for any military expedition or enterprise, to be carried on from the United States, against the territory or dominions of a foreign people or state. To “begin to'set on foot a military expedition,” is not actually setting on foot such expedition: but it is making such preparation for it. as shall show the intent to set it on foot. To “provide or prepare the means for any military expedition or enterprise,” within the law, such preparation must be made as shall aid the expedition. The contribution of money, clothing for the troops, provisions, arms, or any other contribution which shall tend to forward the expedition, or add to the comfort or maintenance of those who are engaged in it, is considered to be in violation of the law. These acts must all be done under such circumstances as to show the criminal intent, unless such intent shall be avowed. And it is hardly to be expected, that when an individual is about to violate tbe laws of his country, he will openly declare his intention to do so. Where the act and the attendant circumstances show the criminal intent, no subterfuges or motives avowed, should screen the citizen from the consequences of such an act.

To come within your cognizance, every violation of this law must have been committed within this state; and by a citizen of the United States. These provisions are highly important, and they should be faithfully executed •against all who violate them. Great excitement is known to exist, at this time, in Canada, from certain hostile movements contemplated by citizens of this country, in conjunction with the disaffected subjects of that country. It is said, on high authority, that associations of citizens of the United States have been formed, along the whole extent of our northern boundary, with the view, at a fixed time, to make a descent upon Canada. That these associations embrace an immense number of individuals, who are known to each other by certain signs and passwords. That they are actively en.gaged in collecting the materials of war, and raising men. That their military officers are appointed; and that, in anticipation of success, they have appointed civil officers.

I cannot but think these accounts have been greatly exaggerated, and that they may have caused an unnecessary degree of alarm. But that there is ground for apprehension of danger, no one can doubt. During the past winter, many of our citizens were engaged in this lawless enterprise. This is proved by the records of our own courts, and the courts of Canada, and by well authenticated accounts which have been published. Indeed, it is notorious that organized bodies of men. though, perhaps, not bearing arms, were marched through the northern part of this and other states, on our northern boundary, with the known intention of invading Canada, who were permitted to pass without molestation. And, it is believed that, in some instances, they were encouraged In their enterprise by contributions of money, provisions, and other necessaries. This state of things is deeply to be lamented. "When our citizens, generally, shall cease to respect the laws, and the high duties they owe to then ■own government, there is but a slender ground of hope that our institutions can be long maintained.

An obedience to the laws is the first duty of every citizen. It lays at the foundation of our noble political structure; and when this great principle shall be departed from, with the public sanction, the moral influence of our government must terminate. Tf there be any one line of policy in which all political parties agree, it is. that we should keep aloof from the agitations of other governments. That we shall not intermingle our national concerns with theirs. And much more, that our citizens shall abstain from acts which lead the subjects of other governments to violence and bloodshed. We have a striking instance of the wisdom of this policy in the early history of our government. During the administration of our first president the French Revolution burst forth, and astonished the civilized world. All Europe combined in arms against republican France. That France which had mingled her arms and her blood with ours in our struggle for independence. That this country should deeply sympathize with so noble, brave and generous an ally, in such a struggle, wa.s natural. Bursts of enthusiasm were witnessed in her behalf, in almost every part of our country, and an ardent desire was evinced to make common cause with her in favor of liberty. And this was claiiiied of our country as a debt of gratitude, and on the ground of treaty stipulations. Had this tide of popular feeling, which threatened to bear down every thing in its course, not been checked, our destinies would have been united with those of France.» We might have participated in her military glory, and ih the renown of her heroes. And the struggles, in which we would have been involved, might have given birth to a race of heroes in our own country, whose deeds of chivalry would have been celebrated in history. But our country would have been wasted by war and rapine; and the pen-of the historian, which recorded the deeds of our heroes, would, also, have told, in all probability, that our country, like Franco, was driven to take refuge from the turbulence of party [1020]*1020factions, under a splendid military despotism.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. O'Sullivan
27 F. Cas. 367 (S.D. New York, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 1018, 2 McLean 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charge-to-grand-juryneutrality-laws-circtdoh-1838.