Charge to Grand Jury

30 F. Cas. 978, 6 Blatchf. 555, 1869 U.S. App. LEXIS 1415

This text of 30 F. Cas. 978 (Charge to Grand Jury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Cas. 978, 6 Blatchf. 555, 1869 U.S. App. LEXIS 1415 (circtsdny 1869).

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge

(charging grand jury). It is proper for me, on this occasion, to explain to you the nature of the duty you are called upon to perform, to show you the importance, at the present time, of a careful and conscientious discharge of that duty, and to direct your attention to some provisions of law and some questions of fact which you will be required to consider. The character of the duty devolving on a grand jury in a court of the United States, many of you doubtless understand. It is that of declaring what persons shall be held to answer in court for violations of the laws of the United States. Your services are made necessary by reason of that provision of the federal constitution which declares, that no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury. This provision, while it affords citizens protection against arbitrary power, carries with it a great responsibility; for, under this provision, it rests with the people, as represented by a grand jury, drawn from the mass of citizens by lot. to say who shall and who shall not be accused of crime in the courts of the United States. You, therefore, represent the important community dwelling m the Southern district, of New York, and, in behalf of that community, you are called on to say what laws of. the United States have been disobeyed witli-in the district; to inquire as to what frauds upon the revenue of the United States have been committed therein; to ascertain what violations of the laws of the United States which provide for the currency, which protect the post office, which guard the soldier and the sailoi from imposition, which forbid smuggling, which punish bribery, perjury or conspiracy to defraud the government, have been committed: to say whether any and what officers of the United States, having sworn to execute and enforce the laws of the United States, have themselves assisted or connived at the evasion of them. The importance of this duty, which [979]*979is obvious from a statement of it, will be more fully appreciated, if you consider the circumstances under which it is now to be discharged.

The war, which decided the question whethet a government framed like ours had the ability to quell by force of arms a great rebellion, raised another question, which is now in process of solution, namely, whether such a gov, ernment can surely provide for the payment of the interest upon a great debt. The interest upon the public debt must be obtained by taxation, and this taxation, under the most favorable circumstances, must be - heavy. It will become odious and intolerable, if it is to be borne by the honest and well-disposed classes alone, and avoided by those willing to grow rich at the expense of their fellow citizens, through fraudulent evasions of the law. This latter class, numerous and powerful, both socially and politically, has, from the beginning, cpnfronted the government in its effort to collect the revenue. At first, the government attempted to compel their obedience by seizure of their property, and large quantities of merchandise detected in the act of escaping taxation were forfeited and sold. But the attempt was a failure, the frauds increased both in number and in magnitude, and the government was compelled to turn to its last resort—the criminal jurisdiction of its courts. It is now, therefore, here and e’sewhere engaged in the effort to check these frauds by means of criminal prosecutions—the indictment, trial, conviction and imprisonment of defrauders of the revenue. Inasmuch, then, as no man can be tried until accused by a grand jury, the government and the community, of which the government is but the representative, now turns to the grand juries of the land, and asks the indictment of every man, whether high or low, rich or poor, who is found to be engaged in fraudulent evasions of legal taxes. Time would fail me to describe to you the various forms which these fraüds assume, but it is my duty to put you in possession of what I have understood to be the facts in regard to some transactions which must come before you, and to allude in general terms to others which your own inquiries will expose.

I begin with what have been designated the drawbn ck cases. These cases have been the subject of examination in the adjoining district, and are transferred to this district because most of the transactions took place here. They are frauds perpetrated under cover of the provisions of a law which enables a person who lias paid taxes upon manufactures which he afterwards exports, to receive back the taxes he has paid, upon proving the actual exportation of the goods. To obtain this drawback, a set of papers is necessary in every ease, consisting first of an internal revenue collector’s certificate, that the tax on the goods has been paid; second, a certificate of the collector of customs, that such goods appear on a ship’s manifest, on file in the custom-house, as actually exported; third, an affidavit by the shipper as to the identity of the goods upon the manifest and the goods upon the tax receipt; fourth, a certificate of an internal revenue collector, that a proper bond to secure the government against any relanding of the goods has been filed with him. These papers must be certified to at the custom-house and then go to the department at Washington, to be examined there. If found correct, a check for the amount of tax, drawn to the order of the shipper, upon the treasury, is returned. Numerous sets of such papers, representing sums of from $300 to $7,01)0 each, all false, no such goods having been exported, there being no such shipper and no such manifest on file, the bonds being fraudulent, the signatures forgeries. and the affidavits perjuries, have, within a space of six months' time, passed through the custom-liousc here and been certified, have then passed through the department at Washington and been there approved, and corresponding checks have been drawn and paid, every one, or nearly every one, upon a forged endorsement, until the total probably exceeds the sum of $700,000. The fraud which I am thus enabled to describe, because it has already been the subject of examination in the adjoining district, is not disputed, and the money is gone. It will be your duty to say who shall be accused before this court as criminally responsible for the transaction. Some of the parlies supposed to have been engaged in this affair are already under bail. One has been brought from Florida, for the arm of the government is long. Others have escaped beyond the seas. It will be your duty, however, to indict all who appear to have been connected in the design, whether present or absent. In your examination of this case,-you will have occasion to see with what looseness the public business is sometimes conducted, for it will appear that great numbers of bonds required by law have been accepted as good, without any identification of signatures or of persons, and without any inquiry as to the sufficiency or even existence of the sureties, the greater part being, in fact, executed in fictitious names or by persons entirely worthless. It will also appear that the genuine seal of an internal revenue collector can constantly appear upon certificates now claimed to be forged, and that part of the files of the collector’s office, being bonds required by law. can be removed and taken to a neighboring city, by persons having no connection whatever with the government, there be dealt with as unknown parties may desire, and then be returned without objection or remark. I have explained the features of this case to you fully, because you will be called on to act in regard to it, and not because it is to any very great extent exceptional.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 978, 6 Blatchf. 555, 1869 U.S. App. LEXIS 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charge-to-grand-jury-circtsdny-1869.