Charest v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Charest v. State

854 So. 2d 1101, 2002 WL 598875

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 19, 2002·No. 1010929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARWOOD, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied because it has been prematurely filed. The petitioner will have the opportunity to file another petition for the writ of certiorari, if necessary, after the Court of Criminal Appeals has made a final decision on return from remand. See Ex parte Pierce, 576 So.2d 258 (Ala.1991); Rule 39, Ala. R.App. P.

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, BROWN, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. STUART, J., recuses herself.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARWOOD, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied because it has been prematurely filed. The petitioner will have the opportunity to file another petition for the writ of certiorari, if necessary, after the Court of Criminal Appeals has made a final decision on return from remand. See Ex parte Pierce, 576 So.2d 258 (Ala.1991); Rule 39, Ala. R.App. P.

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, BROWN, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. STUART, J., recuses herself.*

Charest v. State, 854 So. 2d 1101, 2002 WL 598875 (Ala. 2002).

Pincite

854 So. 2d 1101 (Charest v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related