Charest v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Charest v. State

854 So. 2d 1101, 2002 WL 598875

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 19, 2002

Docket1010929

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 854 So. 2d 1101 (Charest v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charest v. State, 854 So. 2d 1101, 2002 WL 598875 (Ala. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

HARWOOD, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied because it has been prematurely filed. The petitioner will have the opportunity to file another petition for the writ of certiorari, if necessary, after the Court of Criminal Appeals has made a final decision on return from remand. See Ex parte Pierce, 576 So.2d 258 (Ala.1991); Rule 39, Ala. R.App. P.

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, BROWN, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. STUART, J., recuses herself.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARWOOD, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied because it has been prematurely filed. The petitioner will have the opportunity to file another petition for the writ of certiorari, if necessary, after the Court of Criminal Appeals has made a final decision on return from remand. See Ex parte Pierce, 576 So.2d 258 (Ala.1991); Rule 39, Ala. R.App. P.

WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and SEE, BROWN, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. STUART, J., recuses herself.*

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

854 So. 2d 1101, 2002 WL 598875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charest-v-state-ala-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack