Charavay & Bodvin v. York Silk Mfg. Co.
170 F. 819
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 15, 1909·Published·Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
The exceptions to the report of the special master are overruled, and the report confirmed on his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charavay & Bodvin v. York Silk Mfg. Co., 170 F. 819 (circtsdny 1909).
170 F. 819 (Charavay & Bodvin v. York Silk Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walton v. Commercial Credit Co.
299 N.W. 300 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1941)
Associates Discount Corp. v. C. E. Fay Co.
30 N.E.2d 876 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. Devonshire Financial Service Corp.
167 A. 134 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1933)
Craig v. Industrial Acceptance Corp.
45 F.2d 19 (Eighth Circuit, 1930)
In Re Bell Motor Co.
45 F.2d 19 (Eighth Circuit, 1930)
In Re James, Inc.
30 F.2d 555 (Second Circuit, 1929)
First National Bank v. Marlowe
230 P. 374 (Montana Supreme Court, 1924)
In Re Ford-Rennie Leather Co.
2 F.2d 750 (D. Delaware, 1924)
In re A. E. Fountain, Inc.
282 F. 816 (Second Circuit, 1922)
Wickens v. Scheuer
204 P. 780 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)
In re Bettman-Johnson Co.
250 F. 657 (Sixth Circuit, 1918)
In re K. Marks & Co.
222 F. 52 (Second Circuit, 1915)
Century Throwing Co. v. Muller
197 F. 252 (Third Circuit, 1912)
In re Cattus
183 F. 733 (Second Circuit, 1910)
In re Perlhefter
177 F. 299 (S.D. New York, 1910)