Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 23, 1999·No. Nos. 96-15490, 96-15543, 96-15791, 97-15158 and 97-55115·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Appellee American Airlines filed a “Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc” due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:
The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: “Prior to obtaining [595] the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel.”
With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696 (9th Cir. 1999).
169 F.3d 594 (Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phi Air Medical, LLC v. Corizon, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2021
Vitek v. Freightquote.com, Inc.
D. Maryland, 2020
Gloria Campos v. Benny Whitehead Logistics, LLC
C.D. California, 2020
Ye v. Global Sunrise, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, 2020
Eggleston v. United Parcel Service, Inc
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019
Garza v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
W.D. Washington, 2019
Asarco LLC v. England Logistics Inc.
71 F. Supp. 3d 990 (D. Arizona, 2014)
Brown v. United Airlines, Inc.
720 F.3d 60 (First Circuit, 2013)
Paredes v. Air-Serv Corp., Inc.
251 P.3d 1239 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2010)
Branche v. Airtran Airways, Inc.
342 F.3d 1248 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
King Jewelry, Inc. v. Federal Express Corporation
316 F.3d 961 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Shaw v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
128 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (C.D. California, 2001)
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
169 F.3d 594 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)