Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 1999

DocketNos. 96-15490, 96-15543, 96-15791, 97-15158 and 97-55115

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 169 F.3d 594 (Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696 (9th Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Appellee American Airlines filed a “Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc” due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:

The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: “Prior to obtaining [595]*595the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel.”

With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellee American Airlines filed a “Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc” due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:

The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: “Prior to obtaining [595]*595the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel.”

With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8712, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,119 Cherie Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., Missouri Corporation, Mildred Jacoby v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., and John Doe, 1-10 Jane Doe, 1-10 Doe Corporations, 1-10 Doe Partners, 1-10 Doe Entities, 1-10, Bernice Gulley v. American Airlines Amr Corporation American Eagle Airlines, Elizabeth Newman v. American Airlines, Inc., and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Robert A. Beverage v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

160 F.3d 1259 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charas-v-trans-world-airlines-inc-ca9-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack