Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 23, 1999·No. Nos. 96-15490, 96-15543, 96-15791, 97-15158 and 97-55115·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Appellee American Airlines filed a “Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc” due to a factual error in the Opinion. The Opinion filed in this case on November 30, 1998 is amended at Slip op. page 13310, last three lines through page 13311, line 1 [160 F.3d at 1262], as follows:

The last sentence on Slip op. page 13310 [160 F.3d at 1262] and carrying over to the next page should read: “Prior to obtaining [595] the required certificate, Newman was not permitted to board and was required to stay overnight at a motel.”

With this amendment, the en banc panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing and rejects the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 169 F.3d 594, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1359, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712, 1999 WL 86696 (9th Cir. 1999).

169 F.3d 594 (Charas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related