Chara v. O'Malley
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Christian Paul C., File No. 24-cv-772 (ECT/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 30, 2024. ECF No. 14. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ACCEPTED. 2. Plaintiff’s request to reverse or remand the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 9] is DENIED. 3. Defendant’s request to affirm the Commissioner’s decision [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 16, 2024 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chara v. O'Malley (Chara v. O'Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.