Chappie v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Chappie v. United States

585 F. App'x 113

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 24, 2014

DocketNo. 14-7128

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 113 (Chappie v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chappie v. United States, 585 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William B. Chappie appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the United States of America. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chappie v. United States, No. 8:18-cv-01790-RMG, 2014 WL 3615384 (D.S.C. July 21, 2014). We deny Chappie’s motion for summary disposition and remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William B. Chappie appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the United States of America. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chappie v. United States, No. 8:18-cv-01790-RMG, 2014 WL 3615384 (D.S.C. July 21, 2014). We deny Chappie’s motion for summary disposition and remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappie-v-united-states-ca4-2014.