Chappelle v. Gerry Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chappelle v. Gerry Estates, Inc.

2 A.D.2d 762, 153 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 762 (Chappelle v. Gerry Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chappelle v. Gerry Estates, Inc., 2 A.D.2d 762, 153 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action ¡brought against the owner and lessee of land (which lessee is the owner of the building thereon erected) 'by an employee of a tenant to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of slipping in front of an elevator door and falling down the elevator shaft, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict for $25,000 in favor of respondent and against appellants. Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon respondent stipulate to reduce the verdict to $15,000, in which event the judgment as so reduced is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Beldock and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., dissent insofar as the reversal is conditional and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, with the following memorandum: In determining that the door gave way under the impact of respondent’s falling body, which weighed only 115 pounds, the jury did not give proper consideration as to whether respondent forced open the bottom of the door under the stress of mental disorder.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action ¡brought against the owner and lessee of land (which lessee is the owner of the building thereon erected) 'by an employee of a tenant to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of slipping in front of an elevator door and falling down the elevator shaft, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict for $25,000 in favor of respondent and against appellants. Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon respondent stipulate to reduce the verdict to $15,000, in which event the judgment as so reduced is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the verdict is excessive. Nolan, P. J., Beldock and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., dissent insofar as the reversal is conditional and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, with the following memorandum: In determining that the door gave way under the impact of respondent’s falling body, which weighed only 115 pounds, the jury did not give proper consideration as to whether respondent forced open the bottom of the door under the stress of mental disorder.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 762, 153 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chappelle-v-gerry-estates-inc-nyappdiv-1956.