Chappell v. Roth
553 S.E.2d 36, 354 N.C. 75
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chappell v. Roth. Read the opinion of the Court — 353 N.C. 690 →
Opinion
Stacey J. CHAPPELL
v.
Anthony W. ROTH and Tony Rothe.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Torin L. Fury, Greensboro, for Roth and Rothe.
Arthur J. Donaldson, Rachel Scott Decker, Greensboro, for Chappell.
Prior report: 353 N.C. 690, 548 S.E.2d 499.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of August 2001."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chappell v. Roth, 553 S.E.2d 36, 354 N.C. 75 (N.C. 2001).
553 S.E.2d 36 (Chappell v. Roth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chappell v. Roth
548 S.E.2d 499 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2001)
Burger v. Doe
553 S.E.2d 36 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2001)