Chappell v. PepsiCo
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION LOIS S. CHAPPELL PLAINTIFF Vs. CASE NO. 3:19CV214 JM PEPSICO and FRITO LAY DEFENDANTS
ORDER On July 30, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint and to provide the mailing addresses of the Defendants within fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so may result in dismissal of her case. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or provided the mailing addresses of the Defendants. Pursuant to Rule 41(b), the Court finds that the case must be involuntarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to follow the Court’s Order. See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386 (1962). The Clerk is directed to close the case. All pending motions are terminated. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2019. Qe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chappell v. PepsiCo (Chappell v. PepsiCo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.